Apple Gender Pay Discrimination Litigation

On June 13, 2024, Cohen Milstein and co-counsel, Altshuler Berzon and Outten & Golden filed a class action gender pay discrimination lawsuit against Apple Inc. in San Francisco Superior Court on behalf of two female employees, who claim that since 2020, Apple has violated California’s Equal Pay Act and Fair Employment and Housing Act by systematically paying women lower wages than male employees who perform substantially similar work.

The women represent more than 12,000 current and former female employees in Apple’s engineering, marketing, and AppleCare divisions in California.

(*Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.)

Submit Your Information

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
Super Lawyers badge
law 360 badge

Case Background

Apple Inc., headquartered in Cupertino, California, is one of the world’s largest developers of computer and phone-related products and services. Plaintiffs allege that Apple maintains a centrally determined and uniformly applied policy and/or practice of paying its female employees less than male employees for substantially similar work. In addition, they claim that the tech giant knows or should have known about these substantial pay disparities for years and has yet to take any action to remedy the inequality.

Specifically, the women claim that before the Fall of 2017, Apple asked job candidates for prior pay information and, when that practice became unlawful in January 2018, Apple continued to inquire about prior pay under the guise of candidates’ pay expectations. Apple used this information to set starting salaries, resulting in lower pay rates for women than for men who perform substantially similar work. In effect, Plaintiffs claim that Apple’s policy or practice of collecting information about pay expectations and using that information to set starting salaries has perpetuated past pay disparities and paying women less than men performing substantially similar work.

Additionally, Plaintiffs claim that Apple’s performance evaluation system is biased against women because for scored categories such as teamwork and leadership, men are rewarded and women are penalized for the same behaviors. Because performance evaluation scores have a relationship to bonuses, Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), and pay increases at Apple, Apple’s biased performance evaluation system furthers the disparate impact on women and widens the pay gap.

As a result of Apple’s discriminatory and unlawful pay policies and/or practices, Plaintiffs and putative Class Members have been denied fair compensation for work performed since 2020 and are entitled to compensation due, interest thereon, and liquidated damages, plus interest. In addition to monetary relief, Plaintiffs also seek declaratory and injunctive relief.

Plaintiffs seek all legal and equitable relief available under the California Equal Pay Act, California Labor Code §1197.5; the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code §12900 et seq.; California Business & Professions Code §17200 et seq.; and the California Private Attorneys’ General Act of 2004, California Labor Code § 2698 et seq.

 

Case Document

 

If you are a current or former Apple employee in California and you believe you may have been impacted by this allegedly discriminatory pay practice by Apple, please contact one of our team members below:

Phoebe Wolfe
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Joseph Sellers
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Eve Cervantez
Altshuler Berzon LLP
James Finberg
Altshuler Berzon LLP
Adam Klein
Outten & Golden LLP
Chauniqua Young
Outten & Golden LLP
done

Client Service Leaders

done

Confidential & Safe

done

Phone Consultation Available

done

Advocates Of Inclusivity

start quote

Trusted Help For Employment Law Matters

Recent Cases

LinkSquares Inc. Overtime Case
Caicedo v. LinkSquares Inc., Case No. 24-12642 United States District Court, District of Massachusetts Filed: October 17, 2024 Outten & Golden LLP and Fair Work P.C. represent two former sales employees of LinkSquares, which sells legal and contract management software, in a proposed…
American Airlines Racial Profiling
On May 29, 2024, Outten & Golden and our co-counsel Public Citizen filed a race discrimination lawsuit against American Airlines detailing a horrific incident of racial profiling against Black male passengers. We are proud to represent these plaintiffs as part of our commitment to advancing…
Napoleon et al. v. Meltwater News Inc.
Two former Meltwater Growth Executives filed a lawsuit against Meltwater alleging that Meltwater failed to pay proper overtime wages and violated other state law provisions, by misclassifying them as exempt from overtime.  Meltwater denies these allegations and the Court has not made any…

Recent Results

+
Clients
$ M+
Recovered
Regional Offices
+
Attorneys

685 Third Avenue
25th Floor
New York, NY 10017

212-245-1000

646-509-2060

1225 New York Ave NW
Suite 1200B
Washington, DC 20005

202-847-4400

202-847-4410

One California Street
12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

415-638-8800

415-638-8810