Morgan Stanley AFG Expense Lawsuit

Have you worked as a Financial Advisor or similar role in California and participated in a business expense reimbursement program? If so, we would like to talk to you about your rights under California law.

(*Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.)

Submit Your Information

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Privacy Policy
Super Lawyers badge
law 360 badge

Case Background

We represent California Financial Advisors in litigation against Morgan Stanley to recover the cost of expenses borne by FAs through Morgan Stanley’s Automated Flexible Grid (“AFG”) program from April 23, 2013 to the present.  We have been litigating this case, called Chen v. Morgan Stanley, in Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2014-00724866-CU-OE-CXC, since 2014.

The Chen lawsuit alleges that the AFG program passes the cost of various business expenses—such as support staff compensation, IT infrastructure, and marketing—from the company onto employees.  These policies may violate California laws protecting employees from covering the overhead and other expenses of their employers and protecting against improper pay deductions.

The Chen lawsuit was set to go to trial in 2019, but the trial was delayed by the settlement of an overlapping case, called Harvey v. Morgan Stanley, Case No. 18-cv-02835-WHO, in federal court in San Francisco (the Northern District of California).

The outcome of the Harvey settlement, if it is approved by the court, may impact our lawsuit (Chen).  We will provide additional information on this website as it becomes available.

Regardless, we understand that the AFG program is continuing.  If you are interested in learning about your rights to challenge that program, please contact us.

 

Case Documents:

Summary Adjudication Order

First Amended Complaint

 

Legal Team:

Michael Scimone
Christopher M. McNerney
Jahan Sagafi
Pooja Shethji
done

Client Service Leaders

done

Confidential & Safe

done

Phone Consultation Available

done

Advocates Of Inclusivity

start quote

Trusted Help For Employment Law Matters

Recent Cases

LinkSquares Inc. Overtime Case
Caicedo v. LinkSquares Inc., Case No. 24-12642 United States District Court, District of Massachusetts Filed: October 17, 2024 Outten & Golden LLP and Fair Work P.C. represent two former sales employees of LinkSquares, which sells legal and contract management software, in a proposed…
American Airlines Racial Profiling
On May 29, 2024, Outten & Golden and our co-counsel Public Citizen filed a race discrimination lawsuit against American Airlines detailing a horrific incident of racial profiling against Black male passengers. We are proud to represent these plaintiffs as part of our commitment to advancing…
Napoleon et al. v. Meltwater News Inc.
Two former Meltwater Growth Executives filed a lawsuit against Meltwater alleging that Meltwater failed to pay proper overtime wages and violated other state law provisions, by misclassifying them as exempt from overtime.  Meltwater denies these allegations and the Court has not made any…

Recent Results

+
Clients
$ M+
Recovered
Regional Offices
+
Attorneys

685 Third Avenue
25th Floor
New York, NY 10017

212-245-1000

646-509-2060

1225 New York Ave NW
Suite 1200B
Washington, DC 20005

202-847-4400

202-847-4410

One California Street
12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

415-638-8800

415-638-8810